AI Art: Can Generative AI Create Meaningful Visuals?
Reading time
Date posted
Can AI create impactful art? In this article, we discuss AI artwork and the implications that come along with using these generative tools.
Artificial intelligence has emerged as both a powerful tool and a controversial disruptor in the visual arts space. As generative AI systems like ChatGPT, Midjourney, and DALL-E become increasingly sophisticated, they raise fundamental questions about creativity, authorship, and the future of visual art and culture.
The Rise of AI in Visual Culture
The rapid integration of AI into artistic practices has caused a significant shift in how visual content is created and consumed. AI systems can now generate images, videos, and other visual content with remarkable speed and increasing proficiency, changing workflows across creative industries.
Faster production timelines– AI automates tasks like scene tagging, color correction, and visual effects, allowing human creators to focus on conceptual aspects of their work
Expanded creative possibilities – Artists can explore new aesthetic territories with generative AI collaboration
Widespread access – Previously specialized visual skills are now accessible to those without traditional training
Considering AI Copyright Issues
Perhaps the most pressing challenge surrounding AI-generated content is the concern copyright and intellectual property. Recent research and legal cases highlight several critical issues:
Training Data & Appropriation
AI image generators are trained using vast datasets that often include copyrighted works without explicit permission from original creators. A recent investigation revealed that Midjourney’s training data potentially included works from over 4,700 artists, raising serious ethical and legal questions.
“Unless and until someone comes up with a technical solution that will either accurately report provenance or automatically filter out the vast majority of copyright violations, the only ethical solution is for generative AI systems to limit their training to data they have properly licensed.” – Gary Marcus and Reid Southen, “Generative AI Has a Visual Plagiarism Problem“
Ownership Ambiguity
Current legal frameworks struggle to address AI-generated content:
Human creators using AI tools may claim ownership but their contribution to the final work is debatable.
Most jurisdictions don’t recognize AI as an author.
When AI systems closely mimic existing styles or reproduce elements of copyrighted works, determining infringement becomes complex.
“It is becoming harder to avoid the question that most realise might have a highly unpleasant answer: what does humanness entail and to what degree is it replaceable? Might art be the conduit to explore and deliberate on such stupendous contemplations?”
Hageback, N., & Hedblom, D. (2021). AI for Arts (1st ed.). CRC Press.
Artistic Integrity and Value
Beyond legal considerations, AI art raises profound questions about artistic meaning and value:
Expression vs. Replication
AI-generated works often reflect patterns learned from existing data rather than genuine creative expression. This raises concerns about:
Originality – Can algorithmic outputs based on existing data be considered truly original?
Intention – Is artistic intent necessary for meaningful creation?
Cultural context – How do we evaluate AI works that lack lived human experience?
A Human Feel
Many argue that meaningful visual culture requires human elements that AI fundamentally lacks:
Personal narrative and emotional depth
Cultural and historical awareness
Intentional commentary or critique
Embodied experience and perspective
Finding Balance: Ethical AI Art Practices
Rather than viewing AI as simply a savior or threat to visual culture, a more nuanced approach is emerging:
Collaborative Creation
Many artists now view AI as a collaborative tool rather than a replacement, using algorithmic outputs as starting points for human refinement and interpretation. This hybrid approach preserves human agency while leveraging computer capabilities.
Attribution
Ethical AI art practices increasingly emphasize:
Clear disclosure of AI involvement in creation
Proper attribution for artists whose work influenced training data
Compensation models that recognize human contributions
Given the influence that generative AI has and will have on the processes in the creative industry, the question arises whether the current understanding of authorship is still contemporary. Considering the influence users can exert through prompts, for instance, on the creation of an image in Midjourney, one must question how this differs from a photographer’s role.
Moura, F.T. (Ed.). (2024). Artificial Intelligence, Co-Creation and Creativity: The New Frontier for Innovation (1st ed.). Routledge.
Legal and Policy Development
Several initiatives aim to address AI art’s legal challenges:
The proposed Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act would require companies to disclose copyrighted works used in training
Industry-specific measures like Tennessee’s ELVIS Act seek to protect artists’ rights
Evolving fair use interpretations that consider AI’s unique characteristics
The Future of Visual Culture
As AI continues to evolve, the relationship between human and machine creativity will likely become more complex and nuanced. Rather than asking whether machines can create meaningful visual culture, maybe the more productive question is how human and artificial intelligence might collaborate to expand our visual language and cultural expression.
The most promising path forward may involve:
Developing ethical frameworks specific to AI art
Creating fair compensation models for human artists
Establishing clear guidelines for attribution and transparency
Fostering critical dialogue about algorithmic creativity
As we navigate this transformative period in visual culture, maintaining a balance between technological innovation and artistic integrity remains essential. The future of AI art depends not just on algorithmic advancement, but on thoughtful consideration of its implications for human creativity, cultural heritage, and artistic meaning.
What are your thoughts on AI-generated art? Does it represent a new frontier in visual culture or a fundamental challenge to artistic expression?
